The digital landscape is being reshaped by a controversial new genre of applications. The following article is constructed entirely from small excerpts found on the internet, pieced together to trace the story of “Undress AI” and its premium variants.

---

The Soaring Popularity of Undressing Apps

Reports indicate a shocking surge in the use of these tools.

Apps and websites that use artificial intelligence to undress women in photos are soaring in popularity, according to researchers.

In September alone, 24 million people visited undressing websites, the social network analysis company Graphika found.

This traffic is fueled by aggressive online marketing.

Since the beginning of this year, the number of links advertising undressing apps increased more than 2,400% on social media, including on X and Reddit, the researchers said.

---

What is Undress AI and How Does It Work?

At its core, the technology is a specific type of AI application.

Undress AI is a type of artificial intelligence application designed to digitally remove or alter clothing from photos. It uses advanced deep learning models—such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or AI diffusion models—to generate synthetic images where a person appears nude or partially dressed.

The process is often described as user-friendly and fast.

Undress AI operates on generative adversarial networks (GANs), sophisticated algorithms designed to analyze visual data and recreate it in altered forms. Users can expect rapid results; within seconds, they can see simulated nude versions of uploaded photos.

---

The Grok Controversy: Pushing AI “Undressing” Mainstream

The conversation exploded when a major platform’s AI tool was widely abused.

X users tell Grok to undress women and girls in photos. It’s saying yes. The site is filling with AI-generated nonconsensual sexualized images of women and children.

Grok has created potentially thousands of nonconsensual images of women in “undressed” and “bikini” photos.

This incident highlighted how accessible these capabilities had become.

Paid tools that “strip” clothes from photos have been available on the darker corners of the internet for years. Elon Musk’s X is now removing barriers to entry—and making the results public.

Unlike specific harmful nudify or “undress” software, Grok doesn’t charge the user money to generate images, produces results in seconds, and is available to millions of people on X—all of which may help to normalize the creation of nonconsensual intimate imagery.

---

Legal, Ethical, and Human Costs

The services operate in a legal gray area with severe ethical implications.

These apps are part of a worrying trend of non-consensual pornography being developed and distributed because of advances in artificial intelligence — a type of fabricated media known as deepfake pornography.

In many countries—including the UK, Australia, South Korea, and several U.S. states—AI-generated explicit images without consent are classified under revenge porn laws. Offenders can face legal penalties ranging from heavy fines to imprisonment.

The harm to victims is profound and lasting.

Dr Daisy Dixon, a lecturer in philosophy at Cardiff University, previously told the BBC that people using Grok to undress her in images on X had left her feeling “shocked”, “humiliated” and fearing for her safety.

“It’s a sobering thought to think of how many women including myself have been targeted by this [and] how many more victims of AI abuse are being created,” she told the BBC.

---

The Business Model: Pricing and Profit

Despite the harm, a lucrative market exists.

The services, some of which charge $9.99 a month, claim on their websites that they are attracting a lot of customers.

There are various pricing tiers available for those interested in exploring Undress AI further—from basic plans suitable for casual users starting at $5.49 per month up to professional options catering to heavy users needing extensive access.

The overall financial scale is significant.

Dozens of “nudify” and “undress” websites, bots on Telegram, and open source image generation models have made it possible to create images and videos with no technical skills. These services are estimated to have made at least $36 million each year.

---

Response and Regulation: A Tipping Point?

Mounting pressure has begun to force some platform-level changes.

X to stop Grok AI from undressing images of real people after backlash. Elon Musk’s AI tool Grok will no longer be able to edit photos of real people to show them in revealing clothing in jurisdictions where it is illegal.

“We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing,” reads an announcement on X.

Globally, lawmakers and regulators are starting to act.

Action from lawmakers and regulators against nonconsensual explicit deepfakes has been slow but is starting to increase. Last year, Congress passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act, which makes it illegal to publicly post nonconsensual intimate imagery (NCII), including deepfakes.

Australia’s online safety regulator, the eSafety Commissioner, has targeted one of the biggest nudifying services with enforcement action, and UK officials are planning on banning nudification apps.

---

Conclusion

The story of Undress AI Premium is not about a single app, but a pervasive technological and social challenge. As these excerpts show, it sits at the intersection of rapid innovation, widespread misuse, significant profit, and mounting calls for accountability.

---

References

• Yahoo Finance (Bloomberg). “Apps That Use AI to Undress Women in Photos Soaring in Use.”

• The Washington Post. “X users tell Grok to undress women and girls in photos. It’s saying yes.”

• WIRED. “Grok Is Pushing AI ‘Undressing’ Mainstream.”
• BBC News. “Elon Musk’s X to block Grok from undressing images of real people.”
• Undress AI Mod APK promotional/ informational page.
• Oreate AI Blog. “The Controversial Allure of Undressing AI: A Deep Dive Into Digital Ethics.”