Why Everyone Wants to Buy Twitter

Elon Musk is the most recent wealthy man to have fallen for the entice of Twitter.

For practically its complete 16-year life, Twitter has had the repute that it hasn’t fulfilled its potential and might be a lot extra. Twitter’s conundrum is that it’s extensively identified however not that extensively used, financially profitable however not wildly so, generally competently managed but in addition chaotic, and influential in a approach that’s thrilling but in addition terrifying.

The perpetual perception that Twitter is one huge concept away from being superb has made many individuals take into consideration shopping for the corporate to make it shine, however hardly anybody desires to truly personal it.

Whether or not you’re hooked on Twitter or among the many world’s majority that stays off the app, what occurs to this firm issues. Twitter is a digital gathering place that world leaders more and more worry and wish to management, and the place elected officers, activists, journalists and executives like Musk unfold their messages and settle scores.

Musk made a half-baked proposal final week to purchase Twitter that successfully put a for-sale signal on the corporate. What occurs subsequent is anybody’s guess.

Possibly Musk will wind up proudly owning Twitter, if he stays lengthy sufficient to seek out moneybags to assist him afford his supply of about $43 billion. Maybe a special billionaire, tech firm or monetary investor will purchase it as an alternative. Possibly nobody buys Twitter.

Residing with an unsure future is nothing new for Twitter. You could possibly spend days tallying the variety of instances that corporations have thought-about shopping for the social media web site, or that there have been rumors a few potential sale.

Twitter has been perpetually on the market partly for technical causes. Not like some tech and media corporations together with Google, Fb and The New York Occasions, Twitter doesn’t have a particular sort of inventory that empowers its founders to all however veto a sale.

However there’s additionally the perennial perception that Twitter ought to be one thing aside from what it’s. There’s no scarcity of people that consider that each one Twitter wants is a few repair — an edit perform, completely different administration, a brand new sort of know-how spine, a shift of promoting technique, decrease bills and app tweaks, or extra lax guidelines of expression, as Musk desires.

Politicians and different influential individuals, together with Musk, commonly complain that Twitter is censoring an excessive amount of or too little. And buyers in Twitter perpetually say that the corporate doesn’t make sufficient cash.

If I might boil that right down to a sentence, it’s that Twitter is just not Fb, which has 23 instances the annual income of Twitter and practically two billion day by day customers to Twitter’s 217 million. (The businesses depend customers barely in another way, however you get the purpose.)

“The cultural affect of Twitter is simply as nice as Fb and but it’s one-twentieth of the dimensions,” stated Mark Mahaney, who has adopted Twitter for years as an funding analyst now with Evercore ISI. That makes individuals ask, “‘What’s unsuitable with Twitter?’” he stated.

And but the individuals and firms who’ve regarded intently at shopping for Twitter have largely been scared off. In 2016, Disney backed off its flirtation with shopping for it partly as a result of executives nervous about trashing the corporate’s household pleasant picture if it owned an unruly social media app. The Salesforce boss, Marc Benioff, modified his thoughts when Salesforce’s buyers hated the thought of a enterprise software program firm proudly owning Twitter.

The federal government authorities more than likely wouldn’t allow corporations that will appear to be a very good match with Twitter, together with Google and Fb, to purchase it due to antitrust considerations.

Twitter is simply too huge, but in addition not sufficiently big. It’s good, but in addition not ok. It isn’t Fb, which makes individuals wish to purchase it but in addition not wish to. Twitter might give any proprietor affect but in addition undesirable warmth.

Musk may be one of many few individuals on the earth who’s courageous (or silly) sufficient to wish to personal Twitter and truly do it. Possibly Musk is the one who can lastly unleash Twitter’s potential. Or possibly he’ll simply wind up on the lengthy record of people that as soon as believed that they might.


  • Adverts are in all probability coming to Netflix: The corporate disclosed that it misplaced subscribers and expects to lose extra. In response, Netflix stated that it deliberate to crack down on individuals who share accounts and — this can be a huge one — sooner or later promote a lower-cost subscription with commercials, my colleague Nicole Sperling defined.

    Extra from Vox: Netflix was the streaming chief for a decade. “Now everyone seems to be catching up.”

  • Utilizing memes to assist Ukraine: My colleague Jane Arraf wrote about charitable fund-raising efforts for Ukrainians that promote merchandise that includes wartime visible in-jokes that usually unfold on-line, together with one of many Virgin Mary holding an antitank missile.

  • They’re the tech help and managers for grownup video streaming: Remainder of World goes behind the scenes of Colombia’s business for erotic web streaming, together with individuals who repair on-line glitches for performers, remind them of lunch breaks and assist design day by day matters for webcam reveals. (A heads up that this text has some sexually express descriptions.)

Take a look at this teeny newborn orangutan on the Oregon Zoo.


We wish to hear from you. Inform us what you consider this text and what else you’d like us to discover. You possibly can attain us at ontech@nytimes.com.

If you happen to don’t already get this text in your inbox, please join right here. You too can learn previous On Tech columns.

Leave a Reply