James Murray, Secret Service Director, to Step Down and Join Snap

WASHINGTON — The director of the Secret Service announced on Thursday that he would retire at the end of the month after a 27-year career with the agency that is charged with protecting the president of the United States.

The director, James M. Murray, has accepted a position with the social media company Snap, which is known for its messaging app, Snapchat, an agency spokesman said.

Mr. Murray was appointed by President Donald J. Trump in 2019 after Mr. Trump became disillusioned with the agency’s director at the time, Randolph D. Alles. The director of the Secret Service is appointed by the president and does not require Senate confirmation.

“Joining the Secret Service was the easiest decision I have ever made,” Mr. Murray wrote in a letter to agency employees on Thursday. “Deciding it is time to move on, however, has been one of the most difficult.”

In April, Mr. Murray told the homeland security secretary, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, whose sprawling department includes the Secret Service, that he planned to retire and take a job outside of government, Mr. Murray said in the letter.

In a joint statement, President Biden and the first lady, Jill Biden, expressed appreciation to Mr. Murray. “We are incredibly grateful for his service to our country and our family,” they said.

The Secret Service has come under the spotlight in recent days after more details emerged about Mr. Trump’s actions on Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters attacked the Capitol in an effort to stop the routine process of certifying the results of the presidential election.

Mr. Trump’s protective detail was with him throughout that day. In testimony last week before the House committee investigating the attack, a former White House aide said she was told that Mr. Trump tried to grab the steering wheel of the presidential vehicle and lunged at his lead Secret Service agent after being told he could not go to the Capitol.

Is Bio-Designed Collagen the Next Step in Animal Protein Replacement?

Greater than 90 p.c of collagen and gelatin in the marketplace comes from hogs and cattle, a byproduct of the slaughter trade. The aim of Geltor’s theoretical experiments wasn’t simply to generate hype however to persuade potential shoppers they might make merchandise the present provide chain couldn’t. What in case you weren’t constrained by what sort of animal is offered to supply your collagen?” Dr. Lorestani recalled asking. Then he instructed one mammal specifically, which is how Geltor settled on its first creation: HumaColl21, which the corporate calls “a just about colorless and odorless answer.”

In 2019, the Korean firm AHC launched an eye fixed cream containing HumaColl21. Orora Pores and skin Science, based mostly in Canada, adopted with lotions and serums in 2021. Previously two years, Geltor has launched biologically related marine collagen and human elastin (because the identify implies, a very stretchy protein) for skincare, in addition to a poultry-like collagen supposed to be used in dietary dietary supplements. Microbes rising in large fermenters categorical every of those collagens, that are strained and refined into pure protein. “The protein is rather like what you’d discover within the authentic supply,” Dr. Lorestani mentioned. (The third-party IGEN certification program confirmed there was no detectable genetic materials within the last product.)

A $91.3 million funding spherical in 2020 allowed Geltor to ramp up manufacturing from 35,000 liters in 2019 to 2.2 million liters in 2021, which continues to be a comparatively small quantity. Tiny bottles of luxurious eye lotions require little or no HumaColl21; massive shampoo bottles and jars of collagen powder require extra. Sufficient gelatin to provide Midwest potlucks with vegan Jell-O salads would require exponential progress.

These limits have decided the corporate’s industrial path. “The volumes of product required for the sweetness and private care prospects are completely different than what are required for meals and vitamin prospects,” Dr. Lorestani mentioned.

Regardless of all that funding, there are skeptics. Julie Guthman, a geographer at College of California, Santa Cruz, who investigates Silicon Valley’s forays into agriculture and meals, questions the “magical disruption” behind the alternative-protein trade’s guarantees.

“There’s this concept that in case you produce protein from cells or fermentation in a lab, someway it removes us from land-based meat manufacturing,” she mentioned; these firms nonetheless require vitality, metallic and meals for the microbes themselves. And, she famous, there’s little transparency into their environmental claims, since their patented processes are intently guarded secrets and techniques.