A Timeline of Trump’s False and Misleading Statements on the Mar-a-Lago Search

In the days since former President Donald J. Trump’s Florida home was searched by federal agents last week, he has posted dozens of messages on Truth Social, his social media platform, about the Democrats, the F.B.I. and other perceived foes.

Those statements reflect the strategy Mr. Trump has long used to address controversy, by turns denying any wrongdoing while directing attention elsewhere. Some of the messages also reflect his penchant for false and misleading claims.

Here are some of the false and unsupported statements he has made since the F.B.I.’s search.

Monday and Tuesday, Aug. 8 and 9

In the days following the search, Mr. Trump’s allies focused attention on the F.B.I.’s search warrant for his home at the Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach. Those warrants typically remain under seal unless charges are filed, but many of his supporters suggested that the F.B.I. was not releasing it because the search was politically motivated.

Mr. Trump was free to release the warrant at any time. Instead, he repeatedly linked the White House to the search, suggesting that President Biden or other Democrats knew about it.

“Biden knew all about this,” he wrote on Aug. 9. He provided no evidence.

Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, said President Biden was not given advance notice of the search.

Wednesday, Aug. 10

Mr. Trump said his lawyers and others at Mar-a-Lago were not permitted to watch the search, and suggested the lack of oversight could have allowed the F.B.I. to plant evidence.

He wrote on Truth Social that agents did not want witnesses “to see what they were doing, taking or, hopefully not, ‘planting.’”

But Mr. Trump’s lawyer said during a television interview that the former president watched the search from New York from video provided by security cameras inside of Mar-a-Lago.

Mr. Trump also targeted former President Barack Obama, falsely claiming that his predecessor took more than 30 million documents to Chicago after he left the White House. In a later post, Mr. Trump increased the figure to 33 million documents.

The National Archives and Records Administration, or NARA, responded in a statement, saying that “NARA moved approximately 30 million pages of unclassified records to a NARA facility in the Chicago area, where they are maintained exclusively by NARA.”



How Times reporters cover politics.
We rely on our journalists to be independent observers. So while Times staff members may vote, they are not allowed to endorse or campaign for candidates or political causes. This includes participating in marches or rallies in support of a movement or giving money to, or raising money for, any political candidate or election cause.

Thursday, Aug. 11

After reports showed the F.B.I. sought documents related to “special access programs,” a term reserved for extremely sensitive operations and closely held technologies, Mr. Trump said the F.B.I. could have asked for documents without a search.

He posted on Truth Social that the F.B.I. had already asked him to install an additional padlock in an area where secure documents were kept.

“My attorneys and representatives were cooperating fully, and very good relationships had been established,” he wrote on Aug. 11. “The government could have had whatever they wanted, if we had it.”

Mr. Trump received a subpoena this spring seeking additional documents, and federal officials met with Mr. Trump and his lawyer Evan Corcoran at Mar-a-Lago. After the visit, at least one of Mr. Trump’s lawyers signed a written statement claiming that all material marked as classified and stored in boxes at Mar-a-Lago was returned.

But an inventory of material taken from Mr. Trump’s home during last week’s search showed that agents seized 11 sets of confidential or secret documents.

Friday, Aug. 12

After the warrant was released by a Florida court, an accompanying log showed that 11 sets of classified documents were retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. The warrant also showed that the investigation was related to violations of the Espionage Act.

Mr. Trump then suggested that the documents seized by the F.B.I. were legitimate.

“Number one, it was all declassified,” he wrote.

While presidents have broad powers to declassify information while in office, violations of the Espionage Act still apply to declassified documents.

Saturday and Sunday, Aug. 13 and 14

In a series of posts on Truth Social, Mr. Trump doubled down on his criticism of the F.B.I., saying the agency “has a long and unrelenting history of being corrupt.” He listed discredited claims of election interference during the 2016 election.

Mr. Trump then returned to his earlier, unsupported, claims that the documents could have been planted by the F.B.I.

“There was no way of knowing if what they took was legitimate, or was there a ‘plant?’” he wrote. “This was, after all, the FBI!”

A Timeline of Trump’s False and Misleading Statements on the Mar-a-Lago Search

In the days since former President Donald J. Trump’s Florida home was searched by federal agents last week, he has posted dozens of messages on Truth Social, his social media platform, about the Democrats, the F.B.I. and other perceived foes.

Those statements reflect the strategy Mr. Trump has long used to address controversy, by turns denying any wrongdoing while directing attention elsewhere. Some of the messages also reflect his penchant for false and misleading claims.

Here are some of the false and unsupported statements he has made since the F.B.I.’s search.

Monday and Tuesday, Aug. 8 and 9

In the days following the raid, Mr. Trump’s allies focused attention on the F.B.I.’s search warrant for his home at the Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach. Those warrants typically remain under seal unless charges are filed, but many of his supporters suggested that the F.B.I. was not releasing it because the search was politically motivated.

Mr. Trump was free to release the warrant at any time. Instead, he repeatedly linked the White House to the search, suggesting that President Biden or other Democrats knew about it.

“Biden knew all about this,” he wrote on Aug. 9. He provided no evidence.

Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, said President Biden was not given advance notice of the search.

Wednesday, Aug. 10

Mr. Trump said his lawyers and others at Mar-a-Lago were not permitted to watch the search, and suggested the lack of oversight could have allowed the F.B.I. to plant evidence.

He wrote on Truth Social that agents did not want witnesses “to see what they were doing, taking or, hopefully not, ‘planting.’”

But Mr. Trump’s lawyer said during a television interview that the former president watched the search from New York from video provided by security cameras inside of Mar-a-Lago.

Mr. Trump also targeted former President Barack Obama, falsely claiming that his predecessor took more than 30 million documents to Chicago after he left the White House. In a later post, Mr. Trump increased the figure to 33 million documents.

The National Archives and Records Administration, or NARA, responded in a statement, saying that “NARA moved approximately 30 million pages of unclassified records to a NARA facility in the Chicago area, where they are maintained exclusively by NARA.”



How Times reporters cover politics.
We rely on our journalists to be independent observers. So while Times staff members may vote, they are not allowed to endorse or campaign for candidates or political causes. This includes participating in marches or rallies in support of a movement or giving money to, or raising money for, any political candidate or election cause.

Thursday, Aug. 11

After reports showed the F.B.I. sought documents related to “special access programs,” a term reserved for extremely sensitive operations and closely held technologies, Mr. Trump said the F.B.I. could have asked for documents without a raid.

He posted on Truth Social that the F.B.I. had already asked him to install an additional padlock in an area where secure documents were kept.

“My attorneys and representatives were cooperating fully, and very good relationships had been established,” he wrote on Aug. 11. “The government could have had whatever they wanted, if we had it.”

Mr. Trump received a subpoena this spring seeking additional documents, and federal officials met with Mr. Trump and his lawyer Evan Corcoran at Mar-a-Lago. After the visit, at least one of Mr. Trump’s lawyers signed a written statement claiming that all material marked as classified and stored in boxes at Mar-a-Lago was returned.

But an inventory of material taken from Mr. Trump’s home during last week’s search showed that agents seized 11 sets of confidential or secret documents.

Friday, Aug. 12

After the warrant was released by a Florida court, an accompanying log showed that 11 sets of classified documents were retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. The warrant also showed that the investigation was related to violations of the Espionage Act.

Mr. Trump then suggested that the documents seized by the F.B.I. were legitimate.

“Number one, it was all declassified,” he wrote.

While presidents have broad powers to declassify information while in office, violations of the Espionage Act still apply to declassified documents.

Saturday and Sunday, Aug. 13 and 14

In a series of posts on Truth Social, Mr. Trump doubled down on his criticism of the F.B.I., saying the agency “has a long and unrelenting history of being corrupt.” He listed discredited claims of election interference during the 2016 election.

Mr. Trump then returned to his earlier, unsupported, claims that the documents could have been planted by the F.B.I.

“There was no way of knowing if what they took was legitimate, or was there a ‘plant?’” he wrote. “This was, after all, the FBI!”

On Conservative Radio, Misleading Message Is Clear: ‘Democrats Cheat’

To listen to extra audio tales from publications like The New York Instances, download Audm for iPhone or Android.

November’s midterm elections are nonetheless months away, however to many conservative commentators, the repair is already in. Democrats have cheated earlier than, they are saying, and they’re going to cheat once more.

By no means thoughts that the claims are false.

In Lafayette, La., Carol Ross, host of “The Ross Report,” questioned how Democrats may win a presidential election once more after a tumultuous few years in energy. “They’re going to need to cheat once more,” she stated. “You already know that. There shall be rampant dishonest.”

In Greenville, S.C., Charlie James, a bunch on 106.3 WORD, learn from a weblog put up arguing that “the Democrats are going to lose a majority in the course of the midterm elections until they’re in a position to cheat in a large wide-scale method.”

And on WJFN in Virginia, Stephen Okay. Bannon, the erstwhile adviser to former President Donald J. Trump who was indicted for refusing to adjust to subpoenas issued by the Home committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, summed it up this manner: “If Democrats don’t cheat, they don’t win.”

Mr. Trump launched the nation to a flurry of false claims about widespread voter fraud after his electoral loss in 2020. The extent of his efforts has been outlined extensively previously couple of weeks in the course of the hearings on the Jan. 6 Capitol riot — together with a speech that day wherein he falsely stated Democrats modified voting legal guidelines “as a result of they need to cheat.”

Republican politicians and cable retailers like Fox Information have carried the torch for Mr. Trump’s conspiracy theories ever since. However the loudest and most constant booster of those unfounded claims has been discuss radio, the place conservative hosts scale back the jumble of false voter fraud theories right into a two-word mantra: “Democrats cheat.”

Mentions of “Democrats dishonest” and comparable concepts have been raised greater than 5,000 instances on syndicated radio reveals and native broadcasts this yr, in keeping with an evaluation of knowledge from Vital Point out, a media monitoring service. Related concepts have been talked about just a few hundred instances on tv reveals and podcasts tracked by Vital Point out throughout the identical interval.

Radio stays maybe probably the most influential conduit for right-wing thought, regardless of the rise of podcasts and social media. Tens of tens of millions of individuals nationwide, particularly older People and blue-collar employees, take heed to it repeatedly. Misinformation specialists warn that discuss radio channels, lots of which air political commentary 24 hours a day, obtain far too little scrutiny in contrast with different mass media. Discuss radio can also be uniquely troublesome to investigate and tougher to average, as a result of the on-air musings from hosts normally disappear over the airwaves right away.

“Liberals and even most moderates by no means take heed to it, they don’t take note of it, they don’t see it, they don’t hear it,” stated Lewis A. Friedland, a professor who research radio on the College of Wisconsin-Madison. “So that you don’t realize it exists, you don’t understand how widespread and the way highly effective it truly is.” In Wisconsin, he stated, native radio stations play “excessive right-wing propaganda” 5 – 6 hours a day.

Requested in regards to the false statements, Mr. James, the host of “The Charlie James Present,” and different conservative radio hosts and their networks defended them. Many pointed to examples of voter fraud previously or raised conspiracy theories in regards to
the 2020 election. They stated bleak polling outcomes for the Democrats raised alarms in regards to the integrity of the midterm elections.

“I feel a bunch, visitor or caller on discuss radio is likely to be forgiven questioning if ‘dishonest’ won’t be wanted to win,” stated Tom Tradup, the vice chairman of reports and discuss programming on the Christian and conservative Salem Radio Community.

Different hosts and radio networks declined to remark or didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Liberal commentators have additionally claimed Republicans cheated or will cheat once more, however to a far lesser extent. After Stacey Abrams, the Democratic candidate for governor in Georgia, misplaced in 2018, Democrats raised doubts in regards to the election’s integrity, citing voter suppression. A petition that acquired practically 60,000 signatures after the election was titled: “Don’t Let Georgia Republicans Cheat and Steal the Governor’s Mansion From Stacey Abrams.”

As Ms. Abrams campaigns for the workplace once more this yr, conservative radio hosts have painted her efforts to enhance voter entry, significantly for traditionally disenfranchised teams, as a technique to allow dishonest.

“For this reason Stacey Abrams is doing this within the state of Georgia — to increase the time, the period of time that individuals can vote and drop off ballots,” stated Jennifer Kerns, a visitor on “The Joe Piscopo Present” and host on the All-American Radio community. “It offers them extra time to — as you and I aren’t allowed to say — cheat.”

When radio reveals are distributed by main syndicators like Premiere Networks, a single falsehood or deceptive declare can shortly attain audiences from coast to coast.

Mike Gallagher stated on his radio present not too long ago that “the one method the Democrats can count on to win once more is that if they cheat.” The present was syndicated by way of the Salem Radio Community, permitting it to succeed in tons of of markets from Sacramento, Calif., to Salisbury, Md.

Lots of the deceptive claims centered on measures to enhance voter entry in the course of the 2020 presidential election as Covid-19 swept the nation. Conservative commentators stated makes an attempt to develop vote-by-mail choices or poll drop-off areas have been tantamount to dishonest or straight enabled dishonest.

Some radio networks cracked down on election fraud claims after the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol. Cumulus Media, which owns and operates 406 radio stations, launched a memo on the time saying hosts couldn’t “dog-whistle speak about ‘stolen elections’” on its community. Over a yr later, a number of reveals distributed by way of Westwood One, its syndication arm, have aired claims that Democrats cheated or will cheat within the midterms.

Michael Knowles, a radio and podcast host syndicated by way of Westwood One, gave a stark warning in regards to the midterm elections. “They’re simply going to attempt to cheat and steal the election,” he stated. “That’s what they’re going to attempt to do. You’re seeing it proper now.”

Lars Larson, one other radio host syndicated to over 100 stations by way of Westwood One, warned that the rising reputation of mail-in voting meant “Democrats practically at all times win — or, not less than, they cheat to a win.”

After Mr. Trump misplaced his re-election bid, many false assaults centered on Dominion Voting Techniques, an election expertise firm falsely accused of tampering with election outcomes. Mentions of the corporate plummeted after January 2021, as the corporate filed a lawsuit accusing a number of teams, together with Fox Information, of advancing lies that devastated its popularity and enterprise. However radio hosts continued implying that Democrats would cheat by increasing mail-in voting or conducting so-called poll harvesting, a legislation in lots of states permitting third events to gather and return ballots.

“You don’t get as particular as a specific firm to allow them to’t come again and sue you,” stated Jerry Del Colliano, a professor at New York College and writer of Inside Music Media. He added that the shift in technique towards vaguer dishonest claims “permits them to proceed with this misinformation that their viewers simply loves” with out risking severe penalties from firms or their syndicators.

That leaves many hosts strolling the road between detailing particular claims of stolen elections and rankling advertisers or executives.

“I hesitate to speak about it,” the actor Joe Piscopo stated on his radio present. “You’ll be able to’t say ‘election,’ after which you possibly can’t say the phrase ‘fraud’ proper after that. However you possibly can say it was purchased, there have been shenanigans. I’ve catchphrases, like ‘shenanigans’ or ‘we’re unsure what occurred.’”

When a listener referred to as into “The Lars Larson Present” to counsel that Republicans may cheat to maintain up with Democratic dishonest, Mr. Larson expressed combined emotions.

“My intestine says sure to that,” he replied. “My mind says no.”

In an interview, Mr. Larson pointed to quite a few voter fraud claims from the 2020 election, together with a debunked report that almost 20,000 votes have been acquired late in Arizona. He added that the shortage of proof was anticipated as a result of “with election fraud, particularly vote-by-mail, you’ll by no means have proof.”

Not like tv and even podcasts, radio welcomes stay listener enter. That can provide anybody a second within the nationwide highlight for off-the-cuff remarks and construct the looks of consensus for election conspiracy theories. Among the strongest claims of voter fraud got here from callers, with hosts typically agreeing with their claims.

“There’s no penalty for having these folks on the air,” Mr. Friedland on the College of Wisconsin-Madison stated of the callers. “The truth is, there’s a profit. Your corporation does higher in the event you can skirt the extremes, as a result of that will get extra folks calling in and listening.”

Because the midterms draw close to, commentators are additionally contending with the unintended penalties of their dishonest claims.

Callers repeatedly expressed doubts about voting in any respect, falsely claiming that elections are so rigged by Democrats that their votes now not matter. In response, radio hosts have implored Republicans to vote in even bigger numbers — a lot so {that a} supposed Democratic cheat would show ineffective.

“I’ll inform you what’s occurred — and I give the Democrats a variety of credit score for this,” stated Michael Berry, a radio host primarily based in Houston, “is that they have satisfied lots of people on our facet that it’s not price it to vote.”

Audio produced by Jack D’Isidoro.

On Conservative Radio, Misleading Message Is Clear: ‘Democrats Cheat’

Radio stays maybe essentially the most influential conduit for right-wing thought, regardless of the rise of podcasts and social media. Tens of hundreds of thousands of individuals nationwide, particularly older People and blue-collar employees, take heed to it usually. Misinformation consultants warn that discuss radio channels, lots of which air political commentary 24 hours a day, obtain far too little scrutiny in contrast with different mass media. Discuss radio can also be uniquely troublesome to research and more durable to average, as a result of the on-air musings from hosts normally disappear over the airwaves right away.

“Liberals and even most moderates by no means take heed to it, they don’t take note of it, they don’t see it, they don’t hear it,” mentioned Lewis A. Friedland, a professor who research radio on the College of Wisconsin-Madison. “So that you don’t comprehend it exists, you don’t understand how widespread and the way highly effective it truly is.” In Wisconsin, he mentioned, native radio stations play “excessive right-wing propaganda” 5 – 6 hours a day.

Requested concerning the false statements, Mr. James, the host of “The Charlie James Present,” and different conservative radio hosts and their networks defended them. Many pointed to examples of voter fraud prior to now or raised conspiracy theories concerning the 2020 election. They mentioned bleak polling outcomes for the Democrats raised alarms concerning the integrity of the midterm elections.

“I believe a bunch, visitor or caller on discuss radio is perhaps forgiven questioning if ‘dishonest’ may not be wanted to win,” mentioned Tom Tradup, the vice chairman of reports and discuss programming on the Christian and conservative Salem Radio Community.

Different hosts and radio networks declined to remark or didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Liberal commentators have additionally claimed Republicans cheated or will cheat once more, however to a far lesser extent. After Stacey Abrams, the Democratic candidate for governor in Georgia, misplaced in 2018, Democrats raised doubts concerning the election’s integrity, citing voter suppression. A petition that obtained practically 60,000 signatures after the election was titled: “Don’t Let Georgia Republicans Cheat and Steal the Governor’s Mansion From Stacey Abrams.”

As Ms. Abrams campaigns for the workplace once more this 12 months, conservative radio hosts have painted her efforts to enhance voter entry, notably for traditionally disenfranchised teams, as a approach to allow dishonest.