NLRB Finds Merit in Union Accusations Against Amazon

In an indication that federal labor officers are intently scrutinizing administration conduct throughout union campaigns, the Nationwide Labor Relations Board knowledgeable a lawyer representing employees at Amazon this week that it had discovered benefit in accusations that the corporate had violated labor legislation.

The labor board discovered benefit to costs that the corporate had required employees to attend anti-union conferences at an enormous Staten Island warehouse the place the Amazon Labor Union gained a surprising election victory final month. The dedication was communicated to the union Friday by an legal professional for the labor board’s regional workplace in Brooklyn, in response to Seth Goldstein, a lawyer representing the union.

Such conferences, typically generally known as “captive viewers” conferences, are authorized beneath present labor board precedent. However final month, the board’s normal counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, issued a memo saying that the precedent was at odds with the underlying federal statute, and she or he indicated that she would search to problem it.

In the identical submitting of costs, the Amazon Labor Union accused the corporate of threatening to withhold advantages from workers in the event that they voted to unionize, and of inaccurately indicating to workers that they could possibly be fired if the warehouse have been to unionize and so they didn’t pay union dues. The labor board additionally discovered benefit to those accusations, in response to an e-mail from the legal professional on the regional workplace, Matt Jackson.

Mr. Jackson mentioned the company would quickly concern a criticism reflecting these accusations until Amazon settled the case. The criticism could be litigated earlier than an administrative legislation choose, whose choice could possibly be appealed to the labor board in Washington.

Mr. Goldstein applauded Ms. Abruzzo and the regional workplace for taking “decisive steps ending required captive viewers conferences” and mentioned the precise to unionize “will likely be protected by ending Amazon’s inherently coercive work practices.”

A spokeswoman for the board confirmed the findings. Kelly Nantel, an Amazon spokeswoman, mentioned in an announcement that “these allegations are false and we sit up for displaying that by the method.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.