On Truth Social, F.B.I. Search Prompts Talk of War, Then Conspiracy

Predictions of imminent civil war and calls for violence surged early this week on social media platforms such as Truth Social, the network started by former President Donald J. Trump, after the F.B.I.’s court-approved search of his Florida home on Monday.

The search, which resulted in the seizure of classified documents, according to a copy of the warrant obtained on Friday by The New York Times, set off an immediate outburst of aggressive and threatening language, akin to the public rhetoric that festered in the days leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Truth Social users posted that the United States was born “through an insurrection followed by several years of bloody violence,” and that the country would “become a communist state just as long as we don’t pick up arms and fight back!!” There was talk that “the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants,” a phrase from a letter by Thomas Jefferson, and that “sometimes clearing out dangerous vermin requires a modicum of violence, unfortunately.”

“No more a nice guy,” one user wrote. “We are at war. Promise you it ain’t gonna be civil,” another wrote. “Lock and Load,” wrote a third.

An account bearing the name of Ricky Shiffer, the man who was killed in Ohio by the police on Thursday, ending a standoff that officials said started after he tried to breach the F.B.I.’s Cincinnati office, had posted messages on Truth Social recommending that “patriots” go to Florida and kill federal agents. On Thursday, the same account also appeared to confess to an attack on the F.B.I.

In a series of recent posts, the account had railed against law enforcement and issued a “call to arms,” saying that for two years, “they have been conditioning us to accept tyranny.” When someone asked whether he was proposing terrorism, the account responded: “I am proposing war.” The Times could not immediately confirm whether the Truth Social account belonged to Mr. Shiffer, 42, of Columbus.

Truth Social’s community guidelines note that its “preference is that the removal of users or user-provided content be kept to the absolute minimum” but say that it will take action in cases where the platform is being “used as a tool for crime or any other unlawful acts.” On a list of reasons to report problematic content, Truth Social includes “content that depicts violence or threat of violence.”

The sentiments on Trump’s social media network extended to other platforms as well. One Proud Boys Telegram channel, used by hundreds of members of the militant group, posted in the hours after the search that “civil war is imminent.” On Twitter, there was a tenfold increase in tweets mentioning “civil war” in the 24 hours after the raid, according to Dataminr, a tool that analyzes Twitter data.

But later in the week, a different narrative gained traction, propelled without evidence by other prominent Truth Social users: that calls for violence were posts planted by federal law enforcement officials or Democratic operatives to frame right-wing patriots as insurrectionists and extremists. The point, the conspiracy theory goes, is to give the Biden administration cover to strip Trump supporters of guns, or to set up a pretext for martial law.

Jack Posobiec, a far-right commentator, wrote on Truth Social on Thursday that “ANYONE POSTING ABOUT BEING VIOLENT RIGHT NOW IS A FED.” The news site “Conservative” recommended that people “assume anyone advocating ‘civil war’ or violence of any kind is a plant hoping you will help support the left’s narrative.”

Lara Logan, another right-wing commentator, posted a video on Friday of an anti-F.B.I. sign twisting in the air to show “Trump 2024 MAGA” on the other side, writing that “they have been trying to incite a civil war for some time.”

In the comments to her post, someone wrote: “Remember to take the FBI out.”

Five key takeaways from seventh January 6 US Capitol riot hearing | Donald Trump News

Former President Donald Trump’s function dominated the seventh listening to this 12 months of the US congressional committee investigating the January 6, 2021 assault on the US Capitol.

Whether or not discussing conferences on the White Home after the 2020 election or the function of far-right teams within the violence on January 6, Trump was a relentless theme on the listening to on Tuesday.

The general public session featured for the primary time snippets from the video testimony of former White Home counsel Pat Cipollone, who agreed to talk to the panel final week.

It additionally tried to link Trump’s public rhetoric to the planning of the assault on the Capitol.

Listed here are 5 key takeaways from the listening to:

Cipollone confirms he rejected idea that Pence might overturn election

Cipollone confirmed accounts from earlier testimonies that he vehemently rejected efforts to push Vice President Mike Pence to reverse election outcomes.

A earlier listening to had detailed how some Trump allies believed that the vice chairman, who presides over the counting of electoral school votes, can declare a special consequence than the official election tally.

In a video performed on Tuesday, Cipollone tells the committee that he doesn’t disagree with the testimony of a White Home aide saying that he had described the speculation as “nutty”.

The previous White Home counsel went on to reward Pence for refusing to go together with these efforts, saying he prompt that the ex-vice president ought to obtain the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Individually, witnesses later instructed the committee that Trump added last-minute strains attacking Pence to his January 6 speech, which he delivered forward of the riots.

Congresswoman Stephanie Murphy, a Democrat, stated Trump ad-libbed a number of references to Pence and “combating” in that speech.

“A single scripted reference within the speech to Mike Pence grew to become eight,” Murphy stated.

“A single scripted reference to rally-goers marching to the Capitol grew to become 4, with President Trump ad-libbing that he could be becoming a member of the protesters on the Capitol. Added all through his speech have been references to combating and the necessity for individuals to have braveness and to be sturdy.”

Pat Cipollone's video testimony on a big screen during Tuesday's January 6 hearing.
Pat Cipollone praised Trump for refusing to intervene within the certification of the 2020 election [Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters]

Election deniers and different aides clashed at White Home assembly

The panel portrayed a contentious assembly between election deniers and aides who have been pushing in opposition to unfounded fraud claims on the White Home on December 18, 2020.

Ex-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell and former Nationwide Safety Adviser Michael Flynn had come to the White Home for an unscheduled assembly.

Cipollone stated he pressed for proof to again election fraud allegations, decrying what he known as Powell’s “normal disregard for the significance of truly backing up what you say with details”.

Eric Herschmann, a former White Home lawyer, stated he additionally voiced opposition to a number of the conspiracy theories that have been being floated to again fraud allegations.

For his half, Rudy Giuliani stated he accused aides who weren’t satisfied that there was election fraud of not combating laborious sufficient.

“Possibly I put it one other manner: ‘You’re a bunch of p***ies’,” Giuliani stated.

Different witnesses described screaming and hurling of insults between the 2 camps.

“It bought to the purpose the place the screaming was fully on the market. If you bought individuals stroll in – it was late at evening – it’s been a protracted day, and what they have been proposing I assumed was nuts,” Herschmann tells the committee in a video performed on the listening to.

The panel later confirmed a textual content message by former White Home aide Cassidy Hutchinson, who delivered an explosive testimony late final month, describing the assembly as “unhinged”.

Trump set the date

The panel argued on Tuesday {that a} Trump tweet calling for a “massive protest” in opposition to election leads to Washington, DC, on January 6 set the date for varied far-right teams to descend on town and subsequently storm the Capitol.

“Statistically inconceivable to have misplaced the 2020 Election,” the tweet stated. “Massive protest in D.C. on January sixth. Be there, can be wild!”

Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin stated the founding father of a web site that served as a discussion board for election fraud claims “confirmed how the president’s tweet created a laser-like deal with the date of January 6”.

The panel then performed elements of a video testimony from Jody Williams, proprietor of the now-defunct thedonald.win web site.

“After it was introduced that he was going to be there on the sixth to speak, sure, then the whole lot else was type of shut out, and it was simply going to be on the sixth,” Williams instructed the committee.

The committee displayed posts from that web site calling for bringing handcuffs, shields and bats to the January 6 rally.

Donell Harvin, a former prime intelligence official for the federal government of the District of Columbia (Washington, DC), stated beforehand non-aligned teams from the far-right began coordinating collectively forward of the January 6 assault.

“All of the crimson flags have been up at that time,” Harvin added.

“Now we have far-right militia collaborating with white supremacy teams, collaborating with conspiracy idea teams,” Harvin stated, calling the coordination a “blended ideology”.

He stated the teams have been sharing “operational intelligence” forward of the riot.

Committee makes an attempt to attract link between far-right teams and Trump

The committee tried to attract a link between far-right teams, the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys – that are accused of involvement within the Capitol assault – and Trump and his allies.

Raskin particularly highlighted ties between Trump confidantes Michael Flynn and Roger Stone and the far-right organisations, displaying pictures and textual content messages between the 2 males with members of the teams.

Earlier than the listening to, Stone – a veteran right-wing political operative – denied any wrongdoing.

“Any assertion that I knew prematurely about, was concerned in or condoned any of the unlawful actions on the Capitol is fake,” the Reuters information company quoted Stone as saying in an electronic mail. “Any declare that I knew from any member of the Proud Boys or Oath Keepers about any plan for unlawful actions on January sixth can be false.”

The listening to featured a former spokesperson of the Oath Keepers, who described the group as violent and harmful.

Early this 12 months, the Division of Justice charged the Oath Keepers chief Stewart Rhodes with seditious conspiracy in relation to his alleged function within the Capitol assault.

Rhodes has pleaded not responsible.

Trump tried to contact committee witness, Cheney says

Vice Chair Liz Cheney, one among two Republicans on the committee, revealed that Trump tried to contact one of many panel’s witnesses, saying that the incident has been referred to the Justice Division.

“President Trump tried to name a witness in our investigation – a witness you haven’t but seen in these hearings,” she stated.

“That particular person declined to reply or reply to President Trump’s name, and as an alternative alerted their lawyer to the decision; their lawyer alerted us. And this committee has equipped that data to the Division of Justice.

“Let me say another time: We’ll take any efforts to affect witness testimony very critically.”

Democratic Congressman Jim McGovern, who will not be on the panel, pressured that “witness tampering” in a congressional investigation is in opposition to the regulation.

“Donald Trump continues to commit crimes to cowl up his unconstitutional scheme to overturn the 2020 election,” McGovern wrote on Twitter.

Apple Ends Consulting Agreement With Jony Ive, Its Former Design Leader

SAN FRANCISCO — When Jony Ive, Apple’s influential design chief, exited the corporate in 2019, Tim Prepare dinner, its chief government, reassured clients that Mr. Ive, the person who gave the world candy-colored computer systems, would work completely with the corporate for a few years.

Not anymore.

Mr. Ive and Apple have agreed to cease working collectively, based on two individuals with data of their contractual settlement, ending a three-decade run throughout which the designer helped outline each rounded nook of an iPhone and guided growth of its solely new product class lately, the Apple Watch.

When Mr. Ive left Apple in 2019 to begin his personal design agency, LoveFrom, the iPhone maker signed a multiyear contract with him valued at greater than $100 million. That made Apple his agency’s major consumer, individuals with data of the settlement mentioned.

In current weeks, with the contract arising for renewal, the events agreed to not prolong it. Some Apple executives had questioned how a lot the corporate was paying Mr. Ive and had grown annoyed after a number of of its designers left to hitch Mr. Ive’s agency. And Mr. Ive wished the liberty to tackle purchasers with no need Apple’s clearance, these individuals mentioned.

By means of a spokeswoman, Mr. Ive, 55, declined to remark. Apple additionally declined to remark.

Earlier than leaving Apple in June 2019, Mr. Ive had grown disillusioned as Mr. Prepare dinner made the more and more monumental firm targeted extra on operations than on huge design leaps, based on greater than a dozen individuals who labored carefully with Mr. Ive. The designer shifted to a part-time function as Mr. Prepare dinner targeted on promoting extra software program and providers.

In July 2019, Mr. Prepare dinner known as information protection of Mr. Ive’s frustrations at Apple “absurd” and mentioned it “distorts relationships, choices and occasions.”

Mr. Prepare dinner’s technique has been validated by buyers who’ve added $1.5 trillion to Apple’s market valuation in simply over two years, at the same time as some analysts have chided it for the lull in its introduction of revolutionary gadgets.

Jeff Williams, Apple’s chief working officer, will proceed to supervise the corporate’s design groups, with industrial design being led by Evans Hankey and software program design being led by Alan Dye. Apple’s product advertising and marketing workforce, led by Greg Joswiak, the senior vp of selling, has assumed a central function in product decisions.

Mr. Ive’s agency, LoveFrom, will proceed to work with purchasers together with Airbnb and Ferrari, and Mr. Ive will proceed his private work with Sustainable Markets Initiative, the nonprofit run by Prince Charles that focuses on local weather change.

Born and raised exterior London, Mr. Ive joined Apple in 1992 and rose to steer its design workforce. The corporate was getting ready to chapter in 1997 when Steve Jobs tasked Mr. Ive’s workforce with designing the iMac. The bulbous, translucent pc grew to become, on the time, the fastest-selling desktop in historical past. It restored Apple’s enterprise and turned Mr. Ive into Mr. Jobs’s closest collaborator.

“He’s not only a designer,” Mr. Jobs advised his biographer, Walter Isaacson. “He has extra operational energy than anybody at Apple, besides me.”

Mr. Ive additionally developed the iPod’s white earbuds, which impressed Apple’s dancing silhouette promoting marketing campaign, and he supported the creation of the iPhone’s touch-screen know-how.

After Mr. Jobs’s demise from most cancers in 2011, Mr. Ive spearheaded the event of the Apple Watch. The product failed to meet preliminary gross sales expectations, but it surely created a wearables enterprise that final 12 months generated $38 billion in income.

In 2015, Mr. Ive approached Mr. Prepare dinner about leaving Apple, based on 4 individuals accustomed to the dialog. The designer was exhausted from constructing the consensus required to provide the Apple Watch, these individuals mentioned. Mr. Prepare dinner agreed to let Mr. Ive work half time.

4 years later, Mr. Ive and Mr. Prepare dinner introduced the designer would go away Apple to create LoveFrom. In an announcement on the time, Mr. Prepare dinner mentioned, “I’m blissful that our relationship continues to evolve, and I stay up for working with Jony lengthy into the longer term.”

For Electric Vehicle Makers, Winners and Losers in Climate Bill

The climate and energy package awaiting final approval by Congress aims to achieve two goals that are not always compatible: Make electric vehicles more affordable while freezing China out of the supply chain.

Auto industry representatives have been griping that the proposed $7,500 tax credits for electric vehicle buyers come with so many strings attached that few cars will qualify. Buyers can’t have very high incomes, the vehicles can’t cost too much, and the cars and their batteries have to meet made-in-America requirements that many carmakers cannot easily achieve.

“It’s going to be a lot harder for cars to qualify and for consumers to qualify for a federal tax credit for the purchase of an E.V.,” said John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents large U.S. and foreign automakers.

Some companies will benefit more than others from the sweeping legislation, known as the Inflation Reduction Act, which the House is expected to approve on Friday, after the Senate’s approval on Sunday.

The new credits favor companies, like Tesla and General Motors, that have been selling electric cars for years and have reorganized their supply chains to produce vehicles in the United States. A joint venture between G.M. and LG Energy Solution will soon open a battery plant in Ohio, part of a wave of electric vehicle investment by automakers and suppliers.

Vehicles sold by Tesla and G.M. will regain eligibility for incentives that the carmakers had lost because they had sold more than their quota of 200,000 electric cars under current law. The legislation eliminates that cap.

The legislation could be thornier for companies like Toyota and Stellantis, which owns Chrysler, Jeep and Ram, because they have not started making or selling large numbers of battery-powered vehicles in the United States.

The legislation effectively penalizes newer electric car companies, like Lucid and Rivian, whose vehicles may be too expensive to qualify for the credits. The incentives apply to sedans costing no more than $55,000 and pickups, vans or sport utility vehicles costing up to $80,000.

Lucid’s cheapest sedan starts at more than $80,000. Rivian’s electric pickups start at $72,500 but can easily top $80,000 with options. The company said it was exploring whether customers could lock in the incentives by making a binding purchase agreement before the new law took effect.

Even automakers that might lose access to tax credits could benefit from the law in other ways. The bill contains billions of dollars to help carmakers build factories and establish local supply chains. Dealers will profit from a provision granting $4,000 credits to used electric vehicles, with few strings attached.

“We have to look at this law in its totality,” said Margo Oge, former director of the Office of Transportation and Air Quality at the Environmental Protection Agency. “Is it perfect? No. It will create jobs, and it will be good for the climate.”

And once automakers make changes to their supply chains required by the bill, they will be able to offer customers generous incentives for the rest of the decade and then some. It may take a few years, but eventually the legislation will help make electric cars cheaper than gasoline and diesel vehicles, analysts say.

“The consumer tax credit was certainly not written in a way I would write it,” Senator Debbie Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat, told reporters this week, referring to the $7,500 incentive. But in the interest of getting the bill passed, she said, she acceded to the wishes of Senator Joe Manchin III, the West Virginia Democrat. Mr. Manchin has said it makes little sense to subsidize electric vehicles because demand is so strong that there are long waiting lists for many models.

Still, Ms. Stabenow added, “There are a lot of wonderful things in here for us.”

A feature of the bill that has generated the most complaints would require that by 2024 at least 50 percent of the components in an electric car battery come from the United States, Canada or Mexico. The percentage rises to 100 percent in 2028. And the share of the minerals in batteries that have to come from the United States or a trade ally will climb to 80 percent in 2026.

Some industry executives said it would take car companies five years to revamp their supply chains enough for their products to qualify for tax credits.

Others say that is overblown. “I would be shocked if that was the case,” said Joe Britton, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association, whose members include Tesla and suppliers of batteries and raw materials.

While the organization would have preferred fewer restrictions, Mr. Britton said, “we still view this as a huge accelerant of electrification of transportation, especially compared to where we were a month ago.” 

Some of the restrictions on eligibility for a tax credit may not be as strict as they appear and may be up for interpretation. For example, Ms. Stabenow said, it appeared that the $7,500 credit would be valid for all manufacturers through next year before content restrictions kicked in.

The legislation leaves it to regulators to decide which components would be classified as Chinese. It’s unclear, for example, whether Chinese companies like CATL, the world’s largest battery maker, would be frozen out of the market if they produced batteries in the United States. CATL has reportedly been exploring building a factory in the South to supply Ford Motor and BMW.

Most environmentalists have generally applauded the Inflation Reduction Act, despite concessions made to the fossil fuel industry at Mr. Manchin’s insistence, and even though the bill does little for public transportation or two-wheeled vehicles like scooters and electric bicycles.

The Sierra Club, the environmental nonprofit, has long been pushing to reward buyers of used electric vehicles and was happy to see that in the bill, said Katherine J García, director of the organization’s Clean Transportation for All Campaign.

She said it also made sense not to provide incentives to high-income people who didn’t need the help. To qualify for the new electric vehicle credit, buyers cannot have taxable income above $150,000 if they are single filers or $300,000 for joint filers. “It stretches the dollars for the people who need the rebate the most,” Ms. García said.

Tesla, which makes expensive cars that are popular with affluent professionals, has managed to outsell all its rivals in the electric car business despite having lost access to the current federal electric-car tax credit several years ago. That suggests that luxury-car buyers will keep buying electric cars whether they receive a tax break or not.

Eventually the income limits will encourage carmakers to offer less-expensive vehicles, said Mark Wakefield, co-leader of the automotive and industrial practice at AlixPartners, a consulting firm. “You’re going to see a laser focus on getting below the $80,000 and $55,000 caps.”

The price limits and made-in-America rules will also encourage carmakers to develop cheaper batteries that require fewer imported raw materials. Tesla and other carmakers are already selling cars with batteries based on iron and phosphate, known as LFP, rather than batteries that contain nickel and cobalt, which are costly and come from countries with tainted human rights and environmental records. The iron-phosphate batteries are heavier but usually less expensive and longer lasting. The Inflation Reduction Act “is going to increase the growth of LFP,” Mr. Wakefield said.

The legislation contains other provisions that have received less attention but could accelerate sales of electric vehicles and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

There is money to help businesses install electric vehicle chargers, for example. That is important for people who do not have garages or driveways where they can install their own chargers.

There are also tax credits of up to $40,000 for electric or hydrogen trucks and buses. Commercial vehicles account for a disproportionate percentage of greenhouse gases and harmful pollutants from the transportation sector because they spend a lot more time on the road than passenger cars.

“This makes battery electric propulsion for commercial vehicles compelling,” said Gareth Joyce, the chief executive of Proterra, a California company that makes electric buses and technology for trucks and other commercial vehicles.

The things that the bill pressures carmakers to do, such as using U.S.-made batteries, “cannot be achieved overnight,” Mary T. Barra, the chief executive of G.M., said during an appearance with President Biden this month. But the legislation “will be part of the catalyst that helps us move forward,” she added.

Ford expressed almost the same view as G.M. “While its consumer tax credit targets for electric vehicles are not all achievable overnight, the bill is an important step forward to meet our shared national climate goals and help strengthen American manufacturing jobs,” the company said in a statement that urged the House to pass the legislation.